Meeting Schedule: Fourth Thursday of each month at 2:00 PM ET.
All meetings held via Zoom.
Join from your computer, tablet, or smartphone:
Zoom Ethics Subcommittee Meeting
Meeting ID: 710 387 5466 Passcode: 021675 Find your local number
Agendas & Minutes
| Date | Agenda | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| July 27, 2023 | Agenda | Minutes |
| August 24, 2023 | Agenda | Minutes |
| September 28, 2023 | Agenda | Minutes |
| October 26, 2023 | Agenda | Minutes |
| November 23, 2023 | Agenda | Minutes |
| December 28, 2023 | Agenda | Minutes |
| January 25, 2024 | Agenda | Minutes |
| February 22, 2024 | Agenda | Minutes |
| March 28, 2024 | Agenda | Minutes |
| April 25, 2024 | Agenda | Minutes |
| May 23, 2024 | Agenda | Minutes |
| June 27, 2024 | Agenda | Minutes |
Ethics Subcommittee Archive
February 24, 2022: Meeting Cancelled
April 28, 2022: Agenda, No Minutes
May 26, 2022: Meeting Cancelled
November 24, 2022: Cancelled
December 22, 2022: Cancelled
September 23, 2021: Meeting Cancelled
November 25, 2021: Meeting Cancelled
December 23, 2021: Meeting Cancelled
April 23, 2020 No Meeting
July 2020 No Meeting
October 22, 2020: No Meeting
November 2020: No Meeting
December 2020: No Meeting
Committee Resources
- NACM Model Code of Conduct (adopted 08/24/18)
- Ethics Codes Catalog
- Ethics Issues and Challenges
- Courts, COVID, and Vaccinations: What Have We Learned, What Are We Still Learning?
- Scroll down to see related ethics videos
Related Videos
Courts, Workplace Culture, and Technology
August 24, 2023, A Question of Ethics Conversation Episode
Today’s Question of Ethics Conversation looks at workplace culture and technology. It focuses on the ethical challenges to workplace culture and technology as it pertains to Canon 1.1 of the NACM Model Code of Conduct which states that a court professional faithfully carries out all appropriately assigned duties, striving at all times to perform the work:
- Diligently - characterized by steady, earnest, and energetic effort.
- Efficiently - capable of producing desired results with little or no waste (as of time or materials)
- Equitably - dealing fairly and equally with all concerned
- Thoroughly - in a complete or thorough manner
- Courteously - marked by respect for and consideration of others
- Honestly – without cheating, genuine, without frills
- Openly -exposed to general view or knowledge
- Scope of the court professional’s authority.
According to the Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM), an organization's culture defines the proper way to behave within the organization. This culture consists of shared beliefs and values established by leaders and then communicated and reinforced through various methods, ultimately shaping employee perceptions, behaviors and understanding. Organizational culture sets the context for everything an enterprise does. Because industries and situations vary significantly, there is not a one-size-fits-all culture template that meets the needs of all organizations.
Workplace culture has a profound effect on any organization as these statistics bear out.
- 53% of working Americans who have left a job due to workplace culture report leaving because of their relationship with their manager.
- 94% of people managers agree a positive workplace culture creates a resilient team of employees.
- 97% of executives agree their actions have a direct impact on workplace culture
Technology is a tool, but it can have a dramatic effect on workplace culture. “Technology can be used to enhance information and operations, improve public access to court information and services, and reduce administrative costs while increasing efficiency in case processing.”
This Question of Ethics Conversation looks at how technology plays a role in workplace culture for court users, for one’s co-workers, and on a court’s institutional knowledge.
Today’s Moderator
Creadell Webb: Chief Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Officer; First Judicial District, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Today’s Panel
Courtney Whiteside: Director, Municipal Court, St. Louis, Missouri
Karl Thoennes: Court Administrator, 2nd Judicial Circuit, Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Peter Kiefer: Retired Court Professional
Samantha Wallis: Deputy Trial Court Administrator, Supreme Court, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho
Cecelia Garner: Court of Court, General District Court, Richmond, Virginia
Leave a question or comment about the episode at ethics@nacmnet.org
Additional Resources:
Don't have time to watch the episode? You can listen to the episode on your way to or from work:
Quiet Quitting:
What Is It? What Should We Do About It?
April 27, 2023, A Question of Ethics Conversation Episode
“Quiet Quitting.” It is a topic that many of us have heard about. In an era where it is a challenge to hire employees, is “Quiet Quitting” an emerging change in the contract between the court and employees or is it just a new term for some staff not doing their jobs?
In the past it has been given many names: “retiring in place”, “phoning it in,” or “checking out.” What makes this iteration unusual is that it seems to be a mantra heard from younger workers. Millennials and Gen Z workers have often uttered this expression.
- What is Quite Quitting?
- What are the ethical challenges the court faces to ensure professionalism and diligence of staff?
- How can we ensure that we have a common understanding with staff?
- Is this a new term for an old problem?
- What Should we do about It?
Today’s Moderator
Eric Silverberg: Court Administrator, Municipal Court, Tucson, Arizona
Today’s Panel
Courtney Whiteside: Director, Municipal Court, St. louis, Missouri
Kent Pankey: Senior Planner, State Supreme Court, Richmond, Virginia
Norman Meyer: Retired Clerk of Court, United States Bankruptcy Court, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Peter Kiefer, Retired Court Professional
Tina Mattison: Deputy Court Administrator, Consolidated Justice Court, Tucson, Arizona
Karl Thoennes: Court Administrator, Second Judicial Circuit Court, Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Samantha Borden: Staff Assistant, Customer Solutions Division, Water Department, Tucson, Arizona
Leave a question or comment about the episode at ethics@nacmnet.org
Additional Resources:
Quiet Quitting Is A Sign of a Deeper Problem
Why Quiet Quitting Is a Sign of Management Failure
Humorous Video of Different Generations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZURp0qvVho
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU16i34Ss2E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wj2XFvJBdY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5YfJV12Xyo
Hiring Ethical Employees:
Accountability and Background Checks
February 23, 2023, A Question of Ethics Conversation Episode
This is the second of a two-part conversation on hiring ethical employees. Part-one, (held January 26th, 2023), is available on the Ethics Subcommittee Webpage, on the NACM website.
What actions can a court take to optimize the hiring of ethical staff? What can you do to ensure that the people you hire will adhere to your court’s Code of Conduct? Relying on Bruce Weinstein’s book, The Good Ones: Ten Crucial Qualities of High Character Employees, the panel discusses the options courts have to identify ethical employees including interview questions about accountability and background checks. The panel considers questions including:
- Describe a situation in which you took responsibility for a mistake you made. What were the consequences to you for doing so?
- Have you ever taken responsibility for an error that another team member made? Tell me about it.
- Tell me about a typical working day.
Other options the panel discusses include calling references, calling past supervisors, conducting criminal history checks, conducting financial history checks, and drug testing. Finally, Norman Meyer introduces interview questions developed by ChatGPT. Some of the questions include:
- Can you give an example of a time when you had to make an ethical decision in your previous work experience? How did you handle the situation?
- How do you define ethical behavior, and how do you ensure that you are acting ethically in the workplace?
- Have you ever witnessed unethical behavior in the workplace? If so, how did you handle the situation?
- How do you handle conflicts of interest?
- Can you give an example of a time when you had to speak up or take a stand on an ethical issue, even if it was difficult or unpopular?
Today’s Moderator
Norman Meyer: Retired Clerk for the Federal Bankruptcy Court, District of New Mexico
Today’s Panel
Courtney Whiteside: Director, Municipal Court, St. louis, Missouri
Stacy Worby: State Jury Coordinator, Alaska State Court System
Peter Kiefer: Retired Court Professional
Joe Tommasino: Staff Attorney, Justice Court, Las Vegas, Nevada
Leave a question or comment about the episode at ethics@nacmnet.org.
Additional Resources:
Hiring Ethical Employees:
How Can We Hire "The Good Ones"?
January 26, 2023, A Question of Ethics Conversation Episode
What actions can a court take to optimize the hiring of ethical staff? What can you do to ensure that the people you hire will adhere to your court’s Code of Conduct? Relying on the book by Bruce Weinstein, The Good Ones: Ten Crucial Qualities of High Character Employees, the Ethics Subcommittee explores some of the personal qualities that ethical employees possess. These qualities include honesty, accountability, care, courage, fairness, gratitude, humility, loyalty, patience, and presence. What can we do during the selection process to ensure that we hire employees with these qualities?
Today’s Moderator
Norman Meyer: Retired Clerk for the Federal Bankruptcy Court, District of New Mexico
Today’s Panel
- Courtney Whiteside: Director, Municipal Court, St. louis, Missouri
- Stacy Worby: State Jury Coordinator, Alaska State Court System
- Peter Kiefer: Retired Court Professional
- Eric Silverberg: Court Administrator for the City Court in Tucson, Arizona
- Karl Thoennes: Court Administrator, 2nd Judicial Circuit Court, Sioux Falls, South Dakota
- Stacy Owsley: Deputy Human Resources Director, Pima County Superior Court, Tucson, Arizona
- Rick Pierce: Judicial Programs Administrator, Pennsylvania Administrative of the Courts.
Leave a question or comment about the episode at ethics@nacmnet.org.
Additional Resources:
The video is 40 minutes 42 seconds long.
The audio is 38 minutes 46 seconds long.
Courts and Inside Information:
What Can and Should We Do with What We Learn at Work?
September 22nd A Question of Ethics Episode
We are not stockbrokers or day traders, but in our role as court employees we learn a lot. We know about patterns of litigation against businesses and against professionals in the community. We know about protection orders filed against real estate agents; we know about leaking basement litigation; we know about roofing contract litigation. Many cases are sealed and confidential, but most are wide open and available to the public if it takes the time to do the research. Due to the nature of our jobs, we learn about inside information more frequently than the public.
- What is the appropriate use of this information?
- Have you ever applied information obtained at work to our personal lives?
- Do you think it is appropriate for front line staff to share inside court information?
- Are there some applications of inside information that are ethically okay?
Today’s Moderator
Karl Thoennes: Court Administrator for the Second Judicial Circuit, Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Today’s Panel
- Dawn Palermo: Judicial Administrator for the Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court in Harvey, Louisiana
- Kent Pankey: Senior Planner for the Supreme Court of Virginia
- Peter Kiefer: Retired Court Professional
- Eric Silverberg: Court Administrator for the City Court in Tucson, Arizona
Leave a question or comment about the episode at ethics@nacmnet.org.
Additional Resources:
Court Rules and Court Procedures: Technological Innovation
A Question of Ethics Conversation: August 15, 2022
The COVID Pandemic brought the use of technology to the forefront of our conversation worldwide. Technology is expanding at breakneck speed. Is it out stripping courts' ability to manage new technological innovations?
Relevant Ethics Canons
Canon 1 Avoiding Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities
1.1 Performing Court Duties
A court professional faithfully carries out all appropriately assigned duties, striving at all times to perform the work diligently, efficiently, equitably, thoroughly, courteously, honestly, openly, and within the scope of the court professional’s authority.
Canon 2 Performing the Duties of Position Impartially and Diligently
2.1 Independent Judgment
A court professional avoids relationships that would impair one’s impartiality and independent judgment. A court professional is vigilant concerning conflicts of interest and ensures that outside interests are never so extensive or of such a nature as to impair one’s ability to perform court duties.
Discussion Questions
- How can courts implement new technological innovations without infringing on Constitutional rights?
- How can court administrators convince judges who are resistant to change that technology is beneficial?
- What strategies can courts use to alleviate the digital divide?
Today’s Host
Courtney Whiteside, Director St. Louis Municipal Court
Today’s Panel
- Stacy Worby, State Jury Coordinator, Alaska State Court System
- Kent Pankey, Senior Planner, Virginia Supreme Court
- Karl Thoennes, Court Administrator, 2nd Judicial District, Sioux Falls, South Dakota
- Joe Tommasino, Legal Counsel, Justice Court, Las Vegas, Nevada
- Peter C. Kiefer, Retired Court Professional
Leave a question or comment about the episode at ethics@nacmnet.org.
Additional Resources:
Time Marker Sheet
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion: Political Agendas and Affirmative Action by Court Leader's Advantage
A Question of Ethics Conversation: May 2022
NACM has made a commitment to the values of providing equal justice regardless of race, gender, age, ethnicity, sexual orientation or identity, disability, or social economic status. What is the court’s ethical obligation, particularly when it comes to implementing court operations?
This episode of A Question of Ethics will continue to explore diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), and NACM’s commitment to helping provide equal justice. This session was recorded after the Ethics Subcommittee Conference Call on April 28th, 2022. The questions the group explored include:
- Does focusing on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion policies, and programs conflict with the court’s purpose to be a separate, independent, and impartial forum for resolving disputes?
- How do courts keep political agendas out of its efforts to make court personnel and court process equitable for all?
- How does implementing DEI policies and programs compare to Affirmation Action requirements?
- How can courts today be more inclusive and accessible to those having business before it?
Relevant Canons from the NACM Code of Conduct for Court Professionals:
-
- Canon 1.1: Performing Court Duties A court professional faithfully carries out all appropriately assigned duties, striving at all times to perform the work diligently, efficiently, equitably, thoroughly, courteously, honestly, openly, and within the scope of the court professional’s authority.
-
- Canon 1.3: Fairness The court professional makes the court accessible and conducts his or her work without bias or prejudice.
-
- Canon 1.4 Respect for Others A court professional treats litigants, co-workers, and all others interacting with the court with dignity, respect, and courtesy.
-
- Canon 4.1 Inappropriate Political Activity (Paraphrased) A court professional:
-
- retains his or her right to vote
- engages in political activity strictly as a private citizen, in accordance with Federal and state law, with local court rule, and with the policy of the appropriate local governing authority.
- participates in political activity only during non–court hours
- uses only non–court resources
- Never uses his or her position to politically influence others.
Additional Resources:Diversity, Inclusion and Courts
Leave a question or comment about the episode at ethics@nacmnet.org
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion: What is the Court’s Duty? by Court Leader's Advantage
A Question of Ethics Conversation: Summer 2022 Edition of the Court Manager
Courts, Testing, and Vaccinations: What Will Your Court Decide?
A Question of Ethics: A Video Conversation on Courts and Ethics