Being a good manager means being able to monitor performance–to identify what is working well and what is not. The judiciary relies on this aspect of court management, as does the public, to ensure optimum court performance. Ensuring accountability, measuring performance and applying performance measures to court practices are not new concepts. This commitment to delivering fair and speedy justice and improving accountability to the public dates back to the 1970s with the publication of the American Bar Association Time Standards (1976) [ref] Provide link to ABA Time Standards (9176)[/ref] and the COSCA Time Standards (1983). [ref] Provide Link to COSCA Time Standards (1983)[/ref] Over the last several decades, a number of tools have been developed and refined to help court leaders measure and manage performance, such as the Trial Court Performance Standards (1990); [ref] Provide Link to Trial Court Performance Standards (1990)[/ref] Appellate Court Performance Measures (2009); [ref] Provide link to Appellate Court Performance Measures (2009)[/ref] CourTools (2005); [ref] Provide link to CourTools (2005)[/ref] the High Performance Court Framework (2010); [ref] Provide link to “High Performance Court Framework (2010)[/ref] and the Principles for Judicial Administration (2012). [ref] Provide link to Principles for Judicial Administration (2012)[/ref] These documents provide a solid foundation for the court community to help court leaders both measure and manage performance. However, tools alone are simply that–tools–court leaders must be able to apply the tools skillfully to move from performance measurement to performance management.