December 20th Court Leader’s Advantage Podcast Episode
Courts have committed to the advancement of diversity, equity, and inclusion particularly in recruiting and selecting court employees. This commitment however has not been without controversy. One criticism has been that personnel recruitment and selection should be entirely objective and merit based. An evaluation format often cited as an example is the NFL Combine.
The Combine measures prospective professional football players by a number of objective skills: How fast and far can one run? How high can one jump? How much weight can one lift? How far and how accurately can one throw a football? How often can one catch a football and then run with it? How effectively can one block another player? In addition, there are physical attributes that can be objectively measured including height, weight, percentage of body fat, lung capacity, and previous injuries.
This month we ask the questions can and should hiring criteria be objective? Are there measures that we can use to hire managers and supervisors that are devoid of personal or institutional bias?
Stacy Worby, State Jury Coordinator for the Alaska Court System
- Zenell Brown, Executive Court Administrator for Michigan’s Third Circuit Court in Detroit
- J. BeMent, District Court Administrator for the 10th Judicial Administrative District in Athens Georgia
- Elizabeth Rambo, Trial Court Administrator for the Lane County Circuit Court in Eugene, Oregon and
- Stacey Fields, Court Administrator for the Municipal Court in Crestwood, Missouri
Click here to listen to the podcast.
Leave a question or comment about the episode at email@example.com
- December 20th Court Leader’s Advantage Podcast Episode Courts have committed to the advancement of diversity, equity, and inclusion particularly in recruiting and selecting court employees. This […]
- Released on November 15, 2022. The public’s perception of our courts continues to be a topic of concern and curiosity for court professionals. Last month we […]
- Released on October 18, 2022. What do we know about how the public views our courts? We know that the public’s trust and confidence in courts […]
- Released on September 20, 2022. Obtaining customer feedback, obtaining usable feedback, obtaining enough of it to be able to rationally modify court programs, all of these […]
- Released on August 16, 2022. In this episode, we ask the question, “What should our courts be doing now?” This month we bring our discussion on […]
- Released on July 19, 2022. Bail Reform has been praised as an effective way to correct a societal wrong. Its byword has been “bail does not […]
- Online Dispute Resolution has been with us in various forms since the 1990s, although it really became widely accepted a little over five years ago. By […]
- This country’s mental health crisis is by no means limited to adults. We know that young people frequently suffer from traumatic events. This fact has […]
- One unintended consequence of the COVID pandemic has been a phenomenon called “The Great Resignation.” Large numbers of American workers have either quit their jobs or […]
Mental Health and the Courts: The Collaborative Court and Community Effective Criminal Case ManagementReleased on Tuesday, March 15, 2022. In our last two episodes on mental health and the courts we talked about the fact that traditional criminal case […]
- Released on Tuesday, February 15, 2022. We’ve been talking about work-life balance for decades. It is a perennial challenge. What has changed in these last two […]
- Released on Tuesday, January 18, 2022. In November we started our discussion on how mental illness is impacting our nation and particularly our courts. In this […]